Estermann v. Bose

296 Neb. 228 (2017) · Nebraska Supreme Court · April 7, 2017 · No. S-15-1022

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the Nebraska Cooperative Republican Platte Enhancement Project and its board members in J. Daniel Estermann’s action seeking to enjoin condemnation proceedings and the discharge of water onto his property. The court held that the natural resources districts creating N-CORPE properly authorized it to exercise eminent domain under Nebraska’s Interlocal Cooperation Act, and that the condemnation served a public purpose. The court also addressed standing, required permits and approvals, amendment of pleadings, and Nebraska’s common-law restrictions on transferring groundwater off overlying land.

Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Miller-Lerman, J.; Heavican, C.J.; Wright, J.; Cassel, J.; Stacy, J.; Kelch, J.; Funke, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
April 7, 2017
Docket number
S-15-1022
Procedural posture
Estermann appealed from the Lincoln County District Court's grant of summary judgment to the appellees and dismissal with prejudice of his complaint for an injunction. He also challenged the denial of his motion for leave to amend the complaint.
Standard of review
Summary judgment is reviewed to determine whether the pleadings and admitted evidence show no genuine issue of material fact or ultimate inference and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Statutory interpretation is reviewed independently as a question of law. Denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion, but the underlying legal conclusion that an amendment would be futile is reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
published precedential opinion
Parties
J. Daniel Estermann v. Bill Bose, Brad Randel, Jerry Weaver, Terry Martin, Nebraska Cooperative Republican Platte Enhancement Project
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

summary judgmenteminent domainmotion to amendstatutory interpretationappellate procedure

Practice areas

appellate procedurecivil procedureeminent domainreal estatewater lawconstitutional lawstatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether N-CORPE, as a joint entity created under the Interlocal Cooperation Act by natural resources districts possessing eminent-domain authority, could exercise the power of eminent domain.
  2. Whether N-CORPE was required to obtain and identify permits or approvals from the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, natural resources districts, or the Republican River Compact Administration before implementing or operating the project.
  3. Whether the district court properly rejected Estermann's collateral challenge to the county court's jurisdiction over the condemnation proceeding.
  4. Whether the district court properly denied Estermann leave to amend his complaint to allege that N-CORPE needed prior approval from the Republican River Compact Administration.
  5. Whether Nebraska common law prohibited N-CORPE from removing groundwater from overlying land for the augmentation project.
  6. Whether N-CORPE's condemnation served a public use and whether a genuine issue of material fact existed on that question.

Holdings

  1. A joint entity created under Nebraska's Interlocal Cooperation Act may exercise eminent-domain authority held individually by the natural resources districts that created it, when those districts are authorized to exercise that power.
  2. N-CORPE was not required, on the undisputed facts presented, to obtain the conduct-water permit under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-252, the groundwater-transfer permit under § 46-613.01, or separate permits from the Middle Republican and Twin Platte Natural Resources Districts before implementing the project.
  3. The Republican River Compact Administration's approval was not a prerequisite to the physical construction or operation of N-CORPE's augmentation project.
  4. A district court's denial of leave to amend a complaint is generally reviewed for abuse of discretion, but the underlying legal conclusion that the proposed amendment would be futile is reviewed de novo.
  5. Nebraska common law's general prohibition on transferring groundwater off overlying land does not bar an augmentation project authorized by statutes permitting natural resources districts to transport water and use augmentation projects as part of an integrated management plan.
  6. N-CORPE's condemnation action served a public use because its overriding purpose was to help Nebraska comply with the Republican River Compact, even though private irrigators might receive incidental benefits.

Key quotations

When the NRD’s formed N-CORPE as a joint entity under the ICA, they did not lose any of the powers, privileges, or authorities that they separately held, including the power of eminent domain. (at 243)
We agree with the Court of Appeals’ holding in Bailey, and we now hold that an appellate court generally reviews the denial of a motion to amend a complaint for an abuse of discretion; however, an appellate court reviews de novo an underlying legal conclusion that the proposed amendments would be futile. (at 253)
Therefore, we determine that the district court did not err when it determined that N-CORPE’s condemnation action is for a public use. (at 261)

Factual background

N-CORPE, a political subdivision created by four Nebraska natural resources districts under the Interlocal Cooperation Act, developed a stream-flow augmentation project to help Nebraska comply with the Republican River Compact. The project involved withdrawing groundwater from wells and releasing it into Medicine Creek, a tributary of the Republican River, and N-CORPE sought a flowage and right-of-way easement across Estermann's property through condemnation proceedings. Estermann alleged that the project flooded his land and crops and challenged N-CORPE's eminent-domain authority, public purpose, permits, approvals, water transfers, and compliance with the Compact.

Procedural history

N-CORPE filed condemnation proceedings in Lincoln County Court seeking an easement across Estermann's real estate. Estermann filed a separate district court action seeking to enjoin the condemnation proceedings and N-CORPE's discharge of water into Medicine Creek. The district court denied temporary injunctive relief, denied leave to amend after discovery had closed and summary judgment had been filed, granted the appellees' motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed, although its reasoning differed in part from that of the district court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…