Purdie v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Brian Gage

292 Neb. 524 (2016) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · January 15, 2016 · No. No. S-15-282

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of Keith D. Purdie's petition for judicial review of a Nebraska Department of Correctional Services decision denying his request for a lower custody classification. The court held that a contested case is a jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial review under Nebraska's Administrative Procedure Act and that Purdie's custody-classification decision was not a contested case because no law or constitutional right required an agency hearing. The court also affirmed the Court of Appeals' dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Holdings

  1. The presence of a contested case is a jurisdictional requirement for judicial review under the Nebraska Administrative Procedure Act.
  2. The Department of Correctional Services' decision regarding Purdie's custody level was not made in a contested case under the APA.
  3. Because the district court lacked authority to adjudicate the APA petition, the Court of Appeals also lacked power to determine the merits and properly dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Department of Correctional Services' decision denying Purdie's request for a lower custody classification was made in a contested case under the Nebraska Administrative Procedure Act.
  2. Whether the presence of a contested case is a jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial review under the Nebraska Administrative Procedure Act.
  3. Whether the district court and Court of Appeals properly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (16)

  • O’Neal v. State, 290 Neb. 943, 863 N.W.2d 162 (2015)(followed)
  • Kaplan v. McClurg, 271 Neb. 101, 710 N.W.2d 96 (2006)(followed)
  • Abdullah v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 246 Neb. 109, 517 N.W.2d 108 (1994)(followed)
  • Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 132 L. Ed. 2d 418 (1995)(followed)
  • Dittrich v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 248 Neb. 818, 539 N.W.2d 432 (1995)(followed)
  • Abdullah v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 245 Neb. 545, 513 N.W.2d 877 (1994)(followed)
  • Langvardt v. Horton, 254 Neb. 878, 581 N.W.2d 60 (1998)(followed)
  • Richardson v. Board of Education, 206 Neb. 18, 290 N.W.2d 803 (1980)(followed)
  • Kerr v. Board of Regents, 15 Neb. Ct. App. 907, 739 N.W.2d 224 (2007)(followed)
  • Whitesides v. Whitesides, 290 Neb. 116, 858 N.W.2d 858 (2015)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…