VanSkiver v. VanSkiver

303 Neb. 664 (2019) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · July 12, 2019 · No. No. S-18-852

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed a district court order modifying parenting time after finding that the father's threatening and abusive behavior constituted a material change in circumstances affecting the children's best interests. The court held that the district court did not improperly delegate its authority to the children, but clarified that the order suspended the father's scheduled parenting time entirely. The modification order was affirmed as modified.

Court
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the Court
Per curiam; Heavican, C.J.; Miller-Lerman, J.; Cassel, J.; Stacy, J.; Funke, J.; Papik, J.; Freudenberg, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
July 12, 2019
Docket number
No. S-18-852
Procedural posture
Todd J. VanSkiver appealed a district court order modifying the parenting plan and suspending his scheduled parenting time after Anne E. VanSkiver sought modification based on his escalating threatening and erratic behavior.
Standard of review
Modification of a dissolution decree is reviewed de novo on the record and will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court.
Precedential value
Published Nebraska Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Todd J. VanSkiver v. Anne E. VanSkiver
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

visitationchild custodyfamily law procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

family lawfamily law procedurechild custodyvisitationappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a material change in circumstances affecting the children's best interests supported modification of Todd's parenting time.
  2. Whether the district court improperly delegated its judicial authority to determine parenting time by allowing the children to decline visits or decide whether to see Todd.
  3. Whether the district court abused its discretion by limiting or suspending Todd's parenting time.

Holdings

  1. The evidence established a material change in circumstances affecting the children's best interests because Todd's behavior had escalated after the decree and the relationship between Todd and the children had deteriorated.
  2. The district court did not improperly delegate its authority to the children. Properly construed, the order suspended Todd's enforceable parenting-time schedule entirely rather than giving the children authority to establish or enforce a schedule.
  3. The district court did not abuse its discretion by suspending Todd's scheduled parenting time.

Key quotations

The best interests of the children are primary and paramount considerations in determining and modifying visitation rights. (672)
Construed in context with the other provisions of the court’s order of modification, we find the court developed a modified parenting plan designed to protect the children from Todd’s harmful behavior by suspending all of his scheduled parenting time. (674)

Factual background

The parties' marriage was dissolved in April 2015, and Anne received legal and physical custody of their two children while Todd received scheduled parenting time. After the decree, Todd's threatening and erratic behavior escalated; Anne obtained a protection order that Todd violated, and evidence showed the children feared him and experienced stress and anxiety related to contact with him. The district court found that Todd's conduct posed a risk of mental abuse and modified the parenting plan by eliminating scheduled and overnight parenting time, while allowing Todd to petition for additional time after counseling.

Procedural history

The parties' marriage was dissolved in April 2015, with Anne awarded legal and physical custody and Todd awarded parenting time under an agreed parenting plan. In July 2017, Anne moved to modify and suspend Todd's parenting time pending family therapy. After a May 2018 trial, the Adams County District Court found a material change in circumstances, modified the parenting plan, eliminated overnight parenting time, and conditioned further parenting time on counseling. Todd timely appealed, and the Nebraska Supreme Court moved the case to its docket on its own motion.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…