Summary
The New Mexico Supreme Court reviewed the designation of approximately 400,000 acres on Mount Taylor as a registered cultural property under the New Mexico Cultural Properties Act. The Court held that the listing was lawful and that the Committee provided constitutionally sufficient notice and due process. It reversed the inclusion of approximately 19,000 acres of Cebolleta Land Grant common lands, concluding that such land was not state land under the Act.
Holdings
- The Committee's extensive publication, website, media, and personal-notice efforts provided notice reasonably calculated to inform interested parties and an opportunity to be heard. Because the listing was regulatory rulemaking rather than adjudication of individual property rights, personal notice to every affected property owner was not required.
- The Cultural Properties Act does not impose a size limit on listed properties and does not require findings concerning inspection and maintenance before listing. Substantial evidence supported the Committee's finding that Mount Taylor possessed the required integrity.
- Cebolleta Land Grant common lands are not state land for purposes of the Cultural Properties Act and therefore could not be included as state land in the Mount Taylor listing.
- The Mount Taylor listing did not violate the Establishment Clause.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Committee provided constitutionally sufficient notice and opportunity to be heard before permanently listing Mount Taylor as a cultural property.
- Whether the Mount Taylor listing satisfied statutory requirements concerning inspection, maintenance, and integrity.
- Whether Cebolleta Land Grant common lands constitute state land under the Cultural Properties Act.
- Whether the Committee lawfully followed federal historic-preservation procedures and whether changes between the emergency and permanent nominations invalidated the listing.
- Whether the listing violated the Establishment Clause because of Mount Taylor's religious significance.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- ACLU of N.M. v. City of Albuquerque, 2008-NMSC-045, ¶¶ 9, 19, 144 N.M. 471, 188 P.3d 1222(applied)
- Sais v. N.M. Dep't of Corrs., 2012-NMSC-009, ¶ 15, 275 P.3d 104(applied)
- Rio Grande Chapter of Sierra Club v. N.M. Mining Comm'n, 2003-NMSC-005, ¶ 17, 133 N.M. 97, 61 P.3d 806(applied)
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313-14 (1950)(applied)
- Uhden v. New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission, 1991-NMSC-089, ¶¶ 4, 7-13, 112 N.M. 528, 817 P.2d 721(distinguished)
- Timberon Water Co., Inc. v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 1992-NMSC-047, ¶ 23, 114 N.M. 154, 836 P.2d 73(applied)
- Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. N.M. State Corp. Comm'n, 1988-NMSC-036, ¶¶ 14, 21, 107 N.M. 278, 756 P.2d 558(applied)
- Maso v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep't, Motor Vehicle Div., 2004-NMSC-028, ¶ 10, 136 N.M. 161, 96 P.3d 286(applied)
- Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad Mun. Schs. v. Harrell, 1994-NMSC-096, ¶ 52, 118 N.M. 470, 882 P.2d 511(applied)
- Jones v. N.M. State Racing Comm'n, 1983-NMSC-089, ¶ 20, 100 N.M. 434, 671 P.2d 1145(applied)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…