CHRISTOPHER SMITH AND MICHAEL SMITH, AS TRUSTEES OF THE JAY AND PATRICIA SMITH IRREVOCABLE TRUST v. ANNA J. SMITH, AS TRUSTEE OF THE THEODORE P. SMITH INCOME ONLY IRREVOCABLE TRUST, AND ANNA JANE SMITH, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THEODORE P. SMITH, DECEASED

2023 NY Slip Op 03576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department · June 30, 2023 · No. 181 CA 21-01407

Summary

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act did not apply because the property was not used for residential or agricultural purposes. The court also concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish the requirements for a preliminary injunction, including likelihood of success, irreparable injury, and a favorable balance of equities. The order was modified to deny the preliminary injunction and was otherwise affirmed.

Holdings

  1. The appeal from the temporary restraining order was dismissed as moot because the order expired by its nature and was superseded by the preliminary injunction.
  2. The property did not qualify as heirs property under RPAPL 993 because the statute requires that the property be used for residential or agricultural purposes, and the property was used for commercial mining and a campground.
  3. Supreme Court abused its discretion by granting plaintiffs a preliminary injunction because plaintiffs failed to establish likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, or a balance of equities favoring injunctive relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendant's appeal from the order modifying the temporary restraining order was moot after the temporary restraining order was superseded by a preliminary injunction.
  2. Whether the property qualified as heirs property subject to the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act under RPAPL 993.
  3. Whether plaintiffs established the requirements for a preliminary injunction, including likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, and a balance of equities in their favor.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (14)

  • Stubbart v County of Monroe, 58 AD2d 25, 29 [4th Dept 1977], lv denied 42 NY2d 808 [1977](followed)
  • Sysco Syracuse, LLC v Egan, 109 AD3d 1214, 1215 [4th Dept 2013](followed)
  • Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Buffalo v Pisa, 55 AD2d 128, 135 [4th Dept 1976](followed)
  • Nadkos, Inc. v Preferred Contrs. Ins. Co. Risk Retention Group LLC, 34 NY3d 1, 7 [2019](followed)
  • Margolies v Encounter, Inc., 42 NY2d 475, 479 [1977](followed)
  • Destiny USA Holdings, LLC v Citigroup Global Mkts. Realty Corp., 69 AD3d 212, 216 [4th Dept 2009](followed)
  • Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988](followed)
  • Perretta v Perretta, 143 AD3d 878, 879 [2d Dept 2016](followed)
  • Tuminno v Waite, 110 AD3d 1456, 1457 [4th Dept 2013](followed)
  • Lane v Tyson, 133 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2015], lv dismissed 27 NY3d 1033 [2016](distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…