Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed an order denying the defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment arising from an agreement concerning the manufacture and purchase of emergency service vehicles. The court held that the defendant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default based on alleged law office failure and COVID-19-related hardships. Because no reasonable excuse was shown, the court did not address whether the defendant had a potentially meritorious defense.
Holdings
- Defendant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its failure to appear because its attorney offered only vague claims concerning pandemic-related hardships and law office failure.
- Executive Order 202.8 did not provide a relevant excuse because it was issued after the deadline for defendant to appear had passed.
- Because defendant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for the default, the court did not need to consider whether defendant had a potentially meritorious defense.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendant established a reasonable excuse for its failure to appear sufficient to vacate the default judgment under CPLR 2005 and 5015(a)(1).
- Whether Executive Order 202.8 supplied a relevant basis for excusing or tolling defendant's failure to appear.
- Whether the denial of defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment constituted an abuse of discretion.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Butchello v. Terhaar, 176 A.D.3d 1579, 1580-1581 (4th Dep't 2019)(followed)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dysinger, 149 A.D.3d 1551, 1552 (4th Dep't 2017)(followed)
- Calaci v. Allied Interstate, Inc., 108 A.D.3d 1127, 1128 (4th Dep't 2013)(followed)
- Vogt v. Eberhardt, 163 A.D.3d 1514, 1515 (4th Dep't 2018), lv dismissed, 32 N.Y.3d 1091 (2018)(followed)
- Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. Rodriguez, 197 A.D.3d 784, 786 (2d Dep't 2021)(followed)
- Matter of Maziarz v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp., 207 A.D.3d 1065, 1065-1066 (4th Dep't 2022)(considered)
- Little v. Steelcase, Inc., 206 A.D.3d 1597, 1599-1600 (4th Dep't 2022)(considered)
- Brehm v. Patton, 55 A.D.3d 1362, 1363 (4th Dep't 2008)(followed)
- City of Utica v. Mallette, 200 A.D.3d 1614, 1616-1617 (4th Dep't 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.