Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order dismissing class action allegations in a wage-and-hour action brought by home health aides. The court held that the initial class-certification motion was timely and that defendants' refusal to provide requested payroll data justified denying dismissal and compelling production of the data.
Holdings
- The time limitation for filing a motion for class certification applies only to a motion for initial certification; plaintiffs' initial class-certification motion was timely.
- Dismissal of the class action allegations was improper where defendants had refused to provide material payroll data needed to determine whether the prerequisites for class certification could be satisfied.
- Plaintiffs' CPLR 3124 cross-motion to compel production of the requested payroll data should have been granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the time limitation for filing a class-certification motion applied to plaintiffs' initial motion, which had already been timely made.
- Whether defendants could obtain dismissal of the class action allegations based on plaintiffs' failure to renew their certification motion when defendants had withheld material payroll data needed for certification.
- Whether plaintiffs were entitled under CPLR 3124 to compel production of payroll data material and necessary to evaluate class-certification requirements.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- O'Brien v. GEICO Ins. Co., 99 A.D.3d 683, 684(followed)
- Louisiana Mun. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 74 A.D.3d 1291, 1293(followed)
- Chavarria v. Crest Hollow Country Club at Woodbury, Inc., 109 A.D.3d 634, 634(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Metropolitan Cable Communications, 79 A.D.3d 841, 842(followed)
- Galdamez v. Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 A.D.3d 357, 358(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…