Summary
The Ohio Supreme Court held that a prosecutor has no clear legal duty to unilaterally vacate a criminal conviction, and therefore mandamus cannot compel such action. The court affirmed dismissal of a mandamus complaint seeking to require a prosecutor to dismiss convictions based on alleged perjured testimony. The decision underscores that a prosecutor’s duty to ensure a fair trial does not extend to having authority to vacate convictions, and that a relator must establish a clear legal right and duty for mandamus relief.
Holdings
- A prosecutor has no clear legal duty to perform an action that he has no legal authority to undertake; a prosecutor does not have the authority to unilaterally vacate a conviction.
Questions Presented
- Whether a prosecutor has a clear legal duty to dismiss a criminal conviction based on alleged perjured testimony.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- State ex rel. Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, 960 N.E.2d 452(cited)
- State ex rel. Natl. Elec. Contrs. Assn. v. Ohio Bur. of Empl. Servs., 83 Ohio St.3d 179, 181, 699 N.E.2d 64 (1998)(cited)
- Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co., 152 Ohio St.3d 303, 2018-Ohio-8, 95 N.E.3d 382(cited)
- State v. Iacona, 93 Ohio St.3d 83, 104, 752 N.E.2d 937 (2001)(cited)
- State v. Sands, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2007-L-003, 2008-Ohio-6981(mentioned)
- 2020-Ohio-3246(affirmed)
Cited In (4)
- State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, 2021-Ohio-671(applied)
- State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, 2021-Ohio-671, ¶ 6(followed)
- State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, 2021-Ohio-671, ¶ 6(followed)
- State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson, 2021-Ohio-671, ¶ 6(followed)
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…