State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson

State ex rel. Sands v. Coulson (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 671 (Ohio 2021) · Supreme Court of Ohio · March 11, 2021 · No. 2020-0836

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court held that a prosecutor has no clear legal duty to unilaterally vacate a criminal conviction, and therefore mandamus cannot compel such action. The court affirmed dismissal of a mandamus complaint seeking to require a prosecutor to dismiss convictions based on alleged perjured testimony. The decision underscores that a prosecutor’s duty to ensure a fair trial does not extend to having authority to vacate convictions, and that a relator must establish a clear legal right and duty for mandamus relief.

Holdings

  1. A prosecutor has no clear legal duty to perform an action that he has no legal authority to undertake; a prosecutor does not have the authority to unilaterally vacate a conviction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a prosecutor has a clear legal duty to dismiss a criminal conviction based on alleged perjured testimony.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • State ex rel. Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, 960 N.E.2d 452(cited)
  • State ex rel. Natl. Elec. Contrs. Assn. v. Ohio Bur. of Empl. Servs., 83 Ohio St.3d 179, 181, 699 N.E.2d 64 (1998)(cited)
  • Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co., 152 Ohio St.3d 303, 2018-Ohio-8, 95 N.E.3d 382(cited)
  • State v. Iacona, 93 Ohio St.3d 83, 104, 752 N.E.2d 937 (2001)(cited)
  • State v. Sands, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2007-L-003, 2008-Ohio-6981(mentioned)
  • 2020-Ohio-3246(affirmed)

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…