Emery v. Central Oklahoma Health Care

2007 OK 28 (Okla. 2007) · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 2007 · No. No. 102,286

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a claimant previously adjudicated permanently and totally disabled may receive additional medical treatment upon competent proof of a change of condition for the worse, but is generally not entitled to additional temporary total disability benefits when she remains permanently and totally disabled. The court vacated the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion and sustained the Workers' Compensation Court's order awarding additional medical treatment while denying additional temporary total disability benefits. The court noted that additional temporary total disability benefits could be available if a claimant's permanent disability status later improved and a new healing period were established.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the Court
Colbert, J.; Winchester, C.J.; Edmondson, V.C.J.; Watt, J.; Taylor, J.; Lavender, J.; Opala, J.; Kauger, J.; Hargrave, J.
Jurisdiction
Oklahoma
Decision date
May 1, 2007
Docket number
No. 102,286
Procedural posture
Petition for certiorari review of a Court of Civil Appeals opinion sustaining the Workers' Compensation Court's denial of additional temporary total disability benefits while affirming an award of additional medical treatment.
Standard of review
Factual determinations of the Workers' Compensation Court sitting en banc are reviewed under the any-competent-evidence standard; questions of law are reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
published and precedential Oklahoma Supreme Court opinion
Parties
Sally Emery v. Central Oklahoma Health Care, Clarendon National Insurance Company, Workers' Compensation Court
Disposition
vacated

Topics

workers compensationappellate procedurestandard of reviewremedies

Practice areas

workers compensationemployment lawappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a claimant previously adjudicated permanently and totally disabled may receive additional medical treatment upon competent proof of a change of condition for the worse.
  2. Whether proof of a change of condition for the worse and a need for additional medical treatment automatically entitles a permanently and totally disabled claimant to additional temporary total disability benefits.
  3. Whether the Workers' Compensation Court's order could be sustained despite the court's flawed stated reason for denying temporary total disability benefits.

Holdings

  1. A claimant previously adjudicated permanently and totally disabled may receive additional medical treatment when competent evidence establishes a change of condition for the worse.
  2. A claimant previously adjudicated permanently and totally disabled is not entitled to additional temporary total disability benefits merely because the claimant has established a worsening condition and a need for additional medical treatment.
  3. A correct judgment may be affirmed even when the lower tribunal relied on an incorrect legal analysis.

Key quotations

We hold that Claimant's status as permanently totally disabled allows for an award of additional treatment based upon proper evidence, but precludes a further award of benefits for temporary total disability. (158 P.3d at 1054)
Temporary incapacity is necessary to obtain temporary total disability benefits because these benefits must cover a defined period and end when permanent disability can be determined. (158 P.3d at 1057)
It has no application where before, during, and after medical treatment is provided, the injured worker is permanently and totally disabled. (158 P.3d at 1057)

Factual background

Sally Emery injured her lumbar back while working as a nurse for Central Oklahoma Health Care in 1997. She received permanent partial disability awards and was later adjudicated permanently and totally disabled based on the combination of her work injury and a prior injury. After a subsequent worsening of her back condition, the Workers' Compensation Court found a change of condition for the worse and ordered epidural steroid injections and other medical treatment, but the medical evidence did not establish that she had ceased to be permanently and totally disabled or had entered a new temporary healing period.

Procedural history

Emery sustained a work-related lumbar injury and was later adjudicated permanently and totally disabled based on the combination of that injury and a prior injury. After she sought additional medical treatment and temporary total disability benefits based on a change of condition for the worse, the Workers' Compensation Court awarded additional medical treatment but denied temporary total disability benefits. The Workers' Compensation Court sitting en banc affirmed. The Court of Civil Appeals initially vacated and remanded for temporary total disability payments, but withdrew that opinion on rehearing and issued a replacement opinion sustaining the Workers' Compensation Court's order. The Oklahoma Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…