Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota affirmed Randy W. Powers's enhanced sentence for a fifth DUI offense. The court held that, under SDCL 32-23-4.1, periods of incarceration for any prior DUI violation are excluded when calculating the ten-year period for sentence enhancement, even when the incarceration does not relate to the oldest prior conviction.
Holdings
- The ten-year period for determining whether a prior DUI conviction may be used for sentence enhancement excludes any period during which the defendant was incarcerated for any prior violation of SDCL 32-23-1; the incarceration need not relate to the oldest prior conviction.
Questions Presented
- Whether SDCL 32-23-4.1 requires exclusion from the ten-year sentence-enhancement calculation of any period of incarceration for a prior DUI violation, even when the incarceration was not attributable to the oldest prior conviction being evaluated.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Rotenberger v. Burghduff, 2007 SD 7, ¶ 8, 727 N.W.2d 291, 294(followed)
- State v. $1,010.00 in Am. Currency, 2006 SD 84, ¶ 8, 722 N.W.2d 92, 94(followed)
- Chapman v. Chapman, 2006 SD 36, ¶ 11, 713 N.W.2d 572, 576(followed)
- Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. Lyon, 1997 SD 50, ¶ 9, 562 N.W.2d 888, 891(followed)
- In re Famous Brands, Inc., 347 N.W.2d 882, 885 (S.D. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…