In re Stacy D. Chambless

257 S.W.3d 698 (Tex. 2008) · Supreme Court of Texas · June 27, 2008 · No. No. 07-0767

Summary

The Supreme Court of Texas held that a trial court abused its discretion by awarding temporary grandparental visitation without giving the custodial parent a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The court conditionally granted mandamus relief and directed the trial court to vacate the temporary visitation order. The decision discusses the statutory standard for grandparent visitation and the parent's fundamental rights concerning the care, custody, and control of a child.

Court
Supreme Court of Texas
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam
Jurisdiction
Texas
Decision date
June 27, 2008
Docket number
No. 07-0767
Procedural posture
Original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus and an emergency stay from an interim trial-court order awarding the paternal grandparents temporary visitation without giving the child's custodial parent an opportunity to present evidence.
Standard of review
Abuse of discretion for the trial court's visitation decision; mandamus relief is conditionally granted when the trial court abuses its discretion.
Precedential value
Published Texas Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Parties
Stacy D. Chambless, Relator v. Paternal grandparents of J.A.C., Real Party in Interest
Disposition
writ_granted

Topics

grandparent rightsvisitationfamily law proceduredue processappellate procedure

Practice areas

family lawconstitutional lawappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a trial court may award temporary grandparental visitation without giving the custodial parent a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
  2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by awarding grandparental visitation without the grandparents satisfying the statutory requirement to prove that denial of visitation would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional well-being.

Holdings

  1. A parent must be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard before a trial court awards temporary grandparental visitation.
  2. A trial court abuses its discretion when it grants grandparental access without the grandparent proving by a preponderance of the evidence that denial of possession or access would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional well-being.

Key quotations

A parent must be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard before a trial court awards temporary grandparental visitation. (700)
Thus, the trial court abused its discretion in awarding the paternal grandparents temporary visitation with J.A.C. without affording Stacy a meaningful opportunity to be heard. (700)

Factual background

Stacy D. Chambless was the managing conservator of her seven-year-old child, J.A.C., while J.A.C.'s father was the possessory conservator and the paternal grandparents supervised his visitation. After the father died, the grandparents sought visitation and relied on a social-study report opining that denying them access would be very detrimental to J.A.C.'s emotional well-being. The social worker was unavailable for cross-examination, and the trial court nevertheless entered an interim order granting the grandparents three days of visitation each month before Chambless had an opportunity to present evidence.

Procedural history

The trial court appointed Stacy D. Chambless managing conservator and awarded the child's father possessory conservatorship, with the paternal grandparents supervising visitation. After the father died, the grandparents sought court-ordered visitation. The trial court entered an interim order granting the grandparents visitation over Chambless's objection and before she had an opportunity to present evidence; the court of appeals denied mandamus relief, after which Chambless sought relief in the Supreme Court of Texas. The Supreme Court stayed the order and conditionally granted mandamus relief.

Remand instructions

The trial court was directed to vacate its August 14, 2007 temporary order granting grandparental visitation. The writ would issue only if the trial court failed to comply promptly.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…