Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware grants Niantic, Inc.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). The court holds that representative claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 10,946,284, and the claims of the related patents-in-suit, are directed to the abstract idea of tailoring virtual gameplay content based on a player’s location and lack an inventive concept under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The court also denies the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended and supplemental complaint.
Holdings
- Claim 1 of the '284 patent is representative of all claims in the patents-in-suit for purposes of the § 101 analysis because the patents share a common specification and are directed to using a player's location to tailor virtual-game content, while IAR offered no meaningful argument that the dependent claims had distinctive eligibility significance.
- Claim 1 of the '284 patent is directed to the abstract idea of tailoring virtual-game content based on a player's geographic location.
- Claim 1 does not contain an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application.
- The claims of the '284, '797, '827, and '691 patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are directed to an abstract idea and lack an inventive concept.
Questions Presented
- Whether claim 1 of the '284 patent could properly be treated as representative of the claims in the four patents-in-suit for purposes of the § 101 analysis.
- Whether claim 1 of the '284 patent and the claims of the other patents-in-suit were directed to patent-ineligible abstract ideas under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
- Whether the claims contained an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application.
- Whether IAR should be granted leave to file a second amended and supplemental complaint after the court determined that the patents-in-suit were invalid.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- 935 F.3d 187, 195 (3d Cir. 2019)(followed)
- 15 F.4th 1091, 1095 (Fed. Cir. 2021)(followed)
- 110 F.4th 1280, 1290-91 (Fed. Cir. 2024)(followed)
- 404 F. Supp. 3d 1021, 1035 (E.D. Tex. 2019)(followed)
- 881 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)
- 573 U.S. 208, 217 (2014)(followed)
- 1 F.4th 1040, 1043-45 (Fed. Cir. 2021)(followed)
- 134 F.4th 1205, 1211-12 (Fed. Cir. 2025)(followed)
- 792 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2015)(followed)
- 104 F.4th 1350, 1356-59 (Fed. Cir. 2024)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…