Kevin Debbs and Liberty National Trust v. CDK Fund I SPV LLC, CDK Capital Partners I LLC, Cody Kerns, and Essential Fund Services International, LLC

Debbs · United States District Court for the District of Delaware · February 27, 2026 · No. 25-205-RGA

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied Plaintiffs Kevin Debbs and Liberty National Trust’s motion for reargument or reconsideration. The court held that a broad forum-selection clause in the CDK Fund I, LP limited partnership agreement applied to Plaintiffs’ claims and required the action to remain in Delaware after transfer from the Middle District of Florida.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiffs were not entitled to reconsideration because they identified no intervening change in controlling law, newly available evidence, clear error of law or fact, or manifest injustice.
  2. The forum-selection clause was valid, applied to plaintiffs' claims, and bound plaintiffs to litigate in Delaware.
  3. Retransfer was unwarranted, and plaintiffs forfeited any argument that transfer to Delaware was improper after the court found the forum-selection clause valid and applicable.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiffs established a basis for reconsideration or reargument under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e).
  2. Whether the broad forum-selection clause in the CDK LP limited partnership agreement applied to plaintiffs' claims concerning the transfer of their investments to CDK SPV.
  3. Whether the case should be retransferred from the District of Delaware to the Middle District of Florida.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • United States v. McGlory, 202 F.3d 664, 668 (3d Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Blystone v. Horn, 664 F.3d 397, 415 (3d Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Lynch v. Jacobs as Tr. of New Century Liquidating Tr., 2021 WL 5984897, at *1 (D. Del. Nov. 23, 2021)(followed)
  • In re New Century TRS Holdings, Inc., 2023 WL 155449 (3d Cir. Jan. 11, 2023)(followed)
  • Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 63 (2013)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…