Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied Louis Allis, LLC’s motion for summary judgment on Ideal Electric Power Co.’s counterclaims. The court held that disputed evidence concerning ownership and bona fide use of the Louis Allis trademarks created genuine issues of material fact, and it rejected unauthenticated Wayback Machine screenshots while considering other evidence of trademark use.
Holdings
- Summary judgment must be denied where the record contains disputed facts that the moving party identifies as material and a reasonable jury could determine that the challenged trademark use was bona fide.
- Wayback Machine screenshots are not admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 901 when they are unsupported by testimony or a declaration explaining the database's functionality and reliability and are accompanied only by counsel's assertion of authenticity.
Questions Presented
- Whether Louis Allis was entitled to summary judgment on Ideal Electric's counterclaims when the parties disputed whether the relevant trademarks and goodwill were included in the predecessor's asset purchase.
- Whether the evidence submitted by Ideal Electric created a genuine dispute concerning bona fide use of the trademarks in commerce.
- Whether National Oilwell Varco website screenshots obtained from the Wayback Machine were admissible without testimony or a declaration authenticating the functionality and reliability of the database.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Gavrieli Brands LLC v. Soto Massini (USA) Corp., 2019 WL 10248462, at *2 n.3 (D. Del. Apr. 19, 2019)(followed)
- United States v. Bansal, 663 F.3d 634, 667 (3d Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Ritz Hotel, Ltd. v. Shen Mfg. Co., 2009 WL 723394, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2009)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…