Specialtycare Inc., Remote Neuromonitoring Physicians, PC, and Sentient Physicians, PC v. Meritain Health, Inc.

Specialtycare · United States District Court for the District of Delaware · March 17, 2026 · No. C.A. No. 25-198 (MN)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware overruled Plaintiffs’ objections to a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopted the Report. The court held that the No Surprises Act does not create a private right of action and that Plaintiffs could not circumvent that omission by asserting a state-law theory, granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying its motion to stay as moot.

Holdings

  1. The No Surprises Act does not create a private right of action.
  2. Plaintiffs may not circumvent Congress's omission of a private right of action in the No Surprises Act by seeking to enforce a federal right through a state-law theory.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the No Surprises Act creates a private right of action.
  2. Whether Plaintiffs may circumvent the No Surprises Act's omission of a private right of action by seeking to enforce a federal right through a state-law theory.
  3. Whether Defendant's motion to dismiss should be granted and its motion to stay denied as moot.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (2)

  • EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 99-100 (3d Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Guardian Flight, L.L.C. v. Health Care Serv. Corp., 140 F.4th 271, 277 (5th Cir. 2025)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…