Singh v. CDCR

Singh · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · June 3, 2025 · No. 2:24-cv-3294-SCR

Summary

The court recommends dismissing Raghvendra Singh’s action against CDCR and other defendants without prejudice because he failed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. The magistrate judge also ordered the clerk to randomly assign a district judge and advised Singh of the deadline and consequences for filing objections.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to file the required in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee after being ordered to do so.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to comply with the order requiring him to submit an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (1)

  • Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…