Hilary C. v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Hilary C. · United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division · January 13, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-01089

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio grants Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the amount of $2,195.00 following a successful Social Security appeal and remand. The court finds the fee reasonable and orders counsel to refund the previously awarded $898.40 in EAJA fees to Plaintiff.

Holdings

  1. A contingent-fee request under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) is not automatically reasonable merely because it falls within a 25-percent fee agreement; the court must independently review the agreement and determine whether the requested amount reasonably compensates counsel for federal-court work.
  2. Plaintiff's counsel was entitled to $2,195.00 in § 406(b)(1) attorney's fees because the requested amount was reasonable and represented only approximately 3.4 percent of Plaintiff's past-due benefits.
  3. After receiving the § 406(b)(1) fee, counsel must refund the previously awarded EAJA fee of $898.40 to Plaintiff to prevent a double recovery.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's counsel was entitled to an attorney's-fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) after Plaintiff obtained past-due benefits following a sentence-four remand.
  2. Whether the requested $2,195.00 contingent fee was reasonable in light of the fee agreement, the work performed, the results achieved, the effective hourly rate, and the statutory 25-percent ceiling.
  3. Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded EAJA fee to Plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b)(1) award.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Horenstein v. Secretary of HHS, 35 F.3d 261, 262 (6th Cir. 1994) (en banc)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 800, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
  • Rodriquez v. Brown, 865 F.2d 739, 746-47 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Hayes v. Secretary of HHS, 923 F.2d 418, 422 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Joseph J. Royzer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Royzer v. Secretary of HHS, 900 F.2d 981, 981-82 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Tucker v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 136 F.4th 639, 644-45, 648 (6th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Jankovich v. Bowen, 868 F.2d 867, 871 n.1 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Twyla D. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 3:19-cv-368, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40825, at *4 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 2025)(followed by analogy)
  • Jay V.N.I. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 3:20-cv-365, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98031, at *4 (S.D. Ohio June 3, 2024)(followed by analogy)
  • Martha G. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:19-cv-936, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63838, at *6-7 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2023), report and recommendation adopted by 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77738 (S.D. Ohio May 3, 2023)(followed by analogy)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…