Cohn v. Knowledge Connections, Inc.

266 Va. 362 (Va. 2003) · Supreme Court of Virginia · September 12, 2003 · No. 022592

Summary

This Supreme Court of Virginia opinion addresses whether an employer committed actual or constructive fraud by allegedly concealing a manager's gender bias and misrepresenting another employee's qualifications during an employment negotiation. The trial court granted the employer's motions to strike the evidence and set aside the jury's $125,000 verdict for the plaintiff. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove intent to conceal or material fact misrepresentation for actual fraud, and could not establish proximate cause between the alleged misrepresentation and her injury for constructive fraud.

Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
Writing for the Court
G. Steven Agee
Jurisdiction
Virginia
Decision date
September 12, 2003
Docket number
022592
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, which granted KCI's motions to strike the evidence and to set aside the jury verdict.
Standard of review
Review of a trial court's order striking evidence: accept as true all evidence favorable to the plaintiff and reasonable inferences. Review of a motion to set aside a verdict: sustain unless plainly wrong or without evidentiary support.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Laura E. Cohn v. Knowledge Connections, Inc.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

fraudtortscivil procedure

Practice areas

tortsemployment lawcivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court erred in granting KCI's motion to strike the evidence and set aside the jury verdict on the actual fraud claim.
  2. Whether the trial court erred in granting KCI's motion to set aside the verdict on the constructive fraud claim due to lack of proximate cause.

Holdings

  1. The trial court's grant of the motion to strike the evidence and set aside the verdict is affirmed because the plaintiff failed to show an intent to conceal and the alleged statements were opinions, not material facts.
  2. The trial court's grant of the motion to set aside the verdict on constructive fraud is affirmed because the plaintiff failed to establish a causal connection between the alleged misrepresentation and her injury.

Key quotations

A contracting party's willful nondisclosure of a material fact that he knows is unknown to the other party may evince an intent to practice actual fraud. (at 582)
The trial court correctly found that Bonhomme's statements were opinions and, therefore, could not provide the basis for sustaining a claim of actual fraud. (at 581)

Factual background

Cohn was offered a managerial position with Knowledge Connections, Inc. (KCI). The offer was later withdrawn after KCI reassigned the Pentagon office position to another employee, citing alleged gender bias by a Department of Defense official. Cohn alleged KCI made false statements about another employee's qualifications and concealed the official's bias, claiming actual and constructive fraud.

Procedural history

Cohn sued KCI for actual and constructive fraud after KCI withdrew a job offer. The trial court granted KCI's motion to strike Cohn's evidence and set aside the jury verdict. Cohn appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…