Mueller v. State

202 P.3d 404 (Wyo. 2009) · Supreme Court of Wyoming · February 26, 2009 · No. S-08-0057

Summary

The Supreme Court of Wyoming affirmed Mary J. Mueller’s conviction for felony possession of methamphetamine. The court held that the affidavit supporting the search warrant established probable cause, including a sufficient nexus between the suspected criminal activity, the evidence sought, and Mueller’s apartment, and that the citizen informants were sufficiently reliable.

Court
Supreme Court of Wyoming
Writing for the Court
Golden, Justice; Voigt, C.J.; Golden, J.; Hill, J.; Kite, J.; Burke, J.
Jurisdiction
Wyoming
Decision date
February 26, 2009
Docket number
S-08-0057
Procedural posture
Mueller appealed her felony conviction for possession of methamphetamine, challenging the denial of her pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant.
Standard of review
The court reviewed the search-warrant affidavit to determine whether the warrant-issuing judicial officer had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. The affidavit was presumed valid, and doubtful or marginal cases were resolved in favor of sustaining the warrant.
Precedential value
Published Wyoming Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Mary J. Mueller v. State of Wyoming
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

suppression of evidencesearch and seizureprobable causewarrant requirementappellate procedure

Practice areas

Criminal procedureConstitutional lawEvidenceAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the search-warrant affidavit established a sufficient factual nexus between the suspected criminal activity, the evidence sought, and Mueller's apartment.
  2. Whether the affidavit sufficiently established the reliability of the two unnamed citizen informants whose observations supported the warrant.

Holdings

  1. The affidavit provided a sufficient factual nexus because it described the theft of McKim's vehicle and property, placed Costalez and a matching vehicle at the apartment shortly after the theft, and identified the apartment as the location where items were being unloaded.
  2. The affidavit sufficiently established the reliability of the unnamed informants because they were identifiable citizen informants, provided firsthand and detailed observations, independently gave similar descriptions, identified Costalez, and described a vehicle matching the stolen vehicle.

Key quotations

Ultimately, our duty on review simply is to ensure that the warrant-issuing judicial officer had a substantial basis for concluding probable cause existed. (202 P.3d at 406)
The "totality of circumstances" analysis requires the judicial officer simply "to make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place." (202 P.3d at 407)
Simply put, we find that the affidavit provides a sufficient factual nexus between the criminal activity, the evidence to be seized, and the place to be searched. (202 P.3d at 408)

Factual background

A white Mercury Sable was stolen from Jamie McKim, along with personal items inside the vehicle. Witnesses observed two Hispanic men, including Joey Costalez, unloading boxes of clothing from a similar white sedan into the north-side basement apartment at 809 N. 15th Street, which was leased to Mueller. Police later found the stolen vehicle abandoned nearby, and Alfred Martinez reported that Costalez had given him the vehicle. A search of the apartment produced methamphetamine and other drug-related items.

Procedural history

Police searched Mueller's leased basement apartment under a warrant and discovered methamphetamine and drug-related items. The district court denied Mueller's motion to suppress. Following a jury trial, Mueller was convicted and sentenced to four to five years of incarceration, suspended in favor of one year in county jail followed by four years of supervised probation. The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…