Edwards v. Vannoy

Edwards v. Vannoy, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) · Supreme Court of the United States · May 17, 2021 · No. No. 19–5807

Summary

In *Edwards v. Vannoy*, the Supreme Court held that the new rule announced in *Ramos v. Louisiana*—requiring unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal trials—does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. The Court reaffirmed that new procedural rules generally do not apply retroactively under *Teague v. Lane*, and declared the "watershed" exception moribund, as no new procedural rule has ever satisfied it. The decision emphasizes finality of convictions and the limits of habeas corpus relief, rejecting arguments based on the rule's importance, original meaning, or anti-discrimination purpose.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Writing for the Court
KAVANAUGH; ROBERTS; THOMAS; ALITO; GORSUCH; BARRETT
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
May 17, 2021
Docket number
No. 19–5807
Procedural posture
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Standard of review
Teague v. Lane retroactivity framework
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Thedrick Edwards v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedurehabeas corpussixth amendmentconstitutional lawappellate procedure

Practice areas

Criminal lawHabeas corpusConstitutional law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Ramos v. Louisiana, requiring jury unanimity in state criminal trials, applies retroactively on federal collateral review.

Holdings

  1. The Ramos jury-unanimity rule does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. New procedural rules do not apply retroactively on federal collateral review, and the watershed exception is moribund.

Key quotations

New procedural rules do not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. (at 15)
The watershed exception is moribund. It must be regarded as retaining no vitality. (at 15)

Factual background

In 2006, Thedrick Edwards and an accomplice kidnapped a student at gunpoint, robbed him, and later raped two women. Edwards was convicted by a Louisiana jury with 11-1 and 10-2 votes, as permitted by Louisiana law at the time. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. His conviction became final on direct review in 2011.

Procedural history

Edwards was convicted by a non-unanimous jury in Louisiana. He sought federal habeas corpus, arguing that the non-unanimous verdict violated his constitutional right to a unanimous jury. The District Court rejected the claim as foreclosed by Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), and the Fifth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability. While his certiorari petition was pending, this Court decided Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which held that the Sixth Amendment requires a unanimous jury in state criminal trials. The Court granted certiorari to decide whether Ramos applies retroactively on federal collateral review.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…