People v. Staake

2017 IL 121755 (Ill. 2017) · Supreme Court of Illinois · November 30, 2017 · No. 121755

Summary

The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed Jared M. Staake’s conviction for second degree murder and his 18-year sentence. The court held that the State’s amendments from second degree murder to first degree murder did not create a new and additional charge for statutory speedy-trial purposes because the charges involved the same conduct and elements. The court also upheld the appellate court’s rejection of Staake’s causation argument because he failed to make an offer of proof regarding the excluded evidence.

Court
Supreme Court of Illinois
Writing for the Court
Justice Thomas; Chief Justice Karmeier; Justice Freeman; Justice Kilbride; Justice Garman; Justice Burke; Justice Theis
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
November 30, 2017
Docket number
121755
Procedural posture
Defendant sought review of an appellate court judgment affirming his second-degree murder conviction and sentence. He challenged the State's amendment of the murder charge on statutory speedy-trial grounds and challenged the exclusion of causation-related evidence and argument.
Standard of review
The court reviewed de novo whether the subsequently filed charge was new and additional under the statutory speedy-trial rule. It applied forfeiture principles to the evidentiary claim and reviewed the legal requirements for preserving excluded-evidence issues.
Precedential value
Published, precedential opinion of the Supreme Court of Illinois
Parties
Jared M. Staake v. The People of the State of Illinois
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

speedy trialcriminal procedurepreservation of errorappellate procedureevidence

Practice areas

criminal procedureappellate procedurecriminal evidencehomicide

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the State's amendment of the charge from second-degree murder to first-degree murder created a new and additional charge subject to a separate statutory speedy-trial period.
  2. Whether Staake's unpreserved statutory speedy-trial claim could be reviewed under the second prong of plain error or established ineffective assistance of counsel.
  3. Whether the trial court improperly excluded evidence or argument that Box's resistance to medical treatment was an intervening cause of death when Staake failed to make an offer of proof.

Holdings

  1. The first-degree murder charge was not a new and additional charge because the original second-degree murder information alleged the same conduct and gave Staake adequate notice of the material allegations and defense issues involved in the amended charges.
  2. Staake's statutory speedy-trial claim failed because no speedy-trial error occurred; consequently, he could not obtain second-prong plain-error review or establish ineffective assistance based on counsel's failure to raise the claim.
  3. Staake forfeited his challenge to the exclusion of causation-related evidence and argument because the trial court conditionally required an offer of proof, and Staake never made one.

Key quotations

[T]he rule, therefore, centers on whether the defendant had adequate notice of the subsequent charges to allow preparation of a defense. (¶ 38)
Accordingly, we conclude that the first degree murder charge was not a new and additional charge. (¶ 45)
All that was required of the defense by the trial court was that it first explain, outside of the presence of the jury, what testimony it expected to elicit in view of the fact that the medical examiner would be testifying that the cause of death was the stab wound delivered by defendant’s hand. (¶ 52)

Factual background

Staake stabbed Michael Box in the abdomen after Box punched him outside a trailer at a county fair. Box received hospital treatment but left without being officially discharged and died two days later from septic shock and acute peritonitis caused by the stab wound. Staake asserted self-defense and sought to argue that Box's refusal or failure to obtain further medical treatment was an intervening cause of death, but he made no offer of proof and ultimately conceded causation during closing argument.

Procedural history

The circuit court of Schuyler County convicted Staake by jury of second-degree murder and sentenced him to 18 years' imprisonment. The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed, holding that the first-degree murder charge was not a new and additional charge for speedy-trial purposes and that Staake forfeited his causation-evidence claim by failing to make an offer of proof. The Illinois Supreme Court allowed leave to appeal and affirmed the appellate court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…