State v. Brandon M., 273 Neb. 47

State v. Brandon M., 273 Neb. 47, 727 N.W.2d 230 (2007) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · February 2, 2007 · No. No. S-06-508

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court held that restitution may be imposed as a condition of a juvenile disposition when it serves the juvenile’s reformation or rehabilitation. However, the record did not support the $3,000 restitution amount, which the juvenile court had selected without evidentiary support. The court affirmed the remaining dispositional terms, reversed the restitution provision, and remanded for further proceedings.

Court
Supreme Court of Nebraska
Writing for the Court
Stephan, J.; Heavican, C.J.; Wright, J.; Connolly, J.; Gerrard, J.; McCormack, J.; Miller-Lerman, J.
Jurisdiction
Nebraska
Decision date
February 2, 2007
Docket number
No. S-06-508
Procedural posture
Brandon M. appealed from the restitution provision of a dispositional order entered in a Nebraska juvenile delinquency proceeding.
Standard of review
Juvenile cases are reviewed de novo on the record, and the appellate court must reach an independent conclusion from the juvenile court's findings.
Precedential value
Published opinion; precedential
Parties
Brandon M. v. State of Nebraska
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

restitutionremediesappellate procedurestandard of reviewevidence

Practice areas

juvenile lawappellate procedurerestitutioncriminal and delinquency procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the restitution requirements in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2280 and 29-2281, including proof of actual damages by sworn evidence and consideration of the juvenile's financial circumstances, governed restitution imposed at a juvenile dispositional hearing.
  2. Whether the juvenile court plainly erred by ordering $3,000 in restitution when the record did not support the amount of the victim's actual loss.

Holdings

  1. The statutory requirements governing restitution imposed by a sentencing court after a criminal conviction do not apply to restitution ordered during the dispositional phase of a juvenile proceeding, because juvenile proceedings are civil and are directed toward education, treatment, and rehabilitation rather than criminal punishment.
  2. The juvenile court plainly erred in fixing restitution at $3,000 because the record did not support the amount ordered, although restitution itself was appropriate as a condition of the juvenile's reformation and rehabilitation.

Key quotations

Because juvenile proceedings are not criminal proceedings, the order of restitution entered at the dispositional hearing was not imposed by a sentencing court after a conviction. (at 234)
Although strict rules of evidence do not apply at dispositional hearings in juvenile cases, see In re Interest of Rebecka P., 266 Neb. 869, 669 N.W.2d 658 (2003), and § 43-283, the record must nevertheless support the court's action in imposing restitution. (at 235)
On the record before us, there is nothing to support the amount of restitution which Brandon was required to pay to the victim. (at 235)

Factual background

Brandon admitted committing a felony burglary against an 82-year-old neighbor and was adjudicated delinquent. The victim reported a reimbursed stolen check, cash, jewelry, a watch, pins, pearls, and other property, but the record supplied little or no valuation for most items. The juvenile court ordered $3,000 in restitution after acknowledging that its estimate of the victim's losses had been "plucked ... out of the air."

Procedural history

Brandon pleaded guilty to felony burglary and was adjudicated a child described by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-247(2). At disposition, the separate juvenile court of Douglas County ordered him to pay $3,000 in restitution. The Nebraska Supreme Court retained the appeal on its own motion, affirmed the remainder of the dispositional order, reversed the restitution provision, and remanded for further proceedings.

Remand instructions

Remand for further proceedings concerning the amount of restitution; all other portions of the dispositional order were affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…