Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed the dismissal of a family offense petition and the vacatur of a temporary order of protection. The court held that petitioner failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed acts warranting an order of protection and found no basis to disturb the lower court's credibility determinations.
Holdings
- Family Court properly dismissed the petition because petitioner failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed any acts warranting an order of protection in petitioner's favor.
- The Appellate Division found no basis to disturb Family Court's finding that respondent was more credible than petitioner.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court properly dismissed the family offense petition for failure to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed a qualifying family offense or acts warranting an order of protection.
- Whether the Appellate Division had a basis to disturb Family Court's credibility determination favoring respondent over petitioner.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Matter of Tawanna R. v. Michael E.G., 226 A.D.3d 524, 524 (1st Dep't 2024)(followed)
- Matter of Sherida L. v. Hoggarth S., 237 A.D.3d 541, 542 (1st Dep't 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…